Evidence Record
Capture the claim, source, publication date, geography, population/site conditions, method, limitations, conflicts, reviewer, status, and review date.
← B.L.U.E. home
Claims must earn their status
Evidence & Research
B.L.U.E. tracks source quality, applicability, limitations, safety, cost, and readiness before recommending implementation.
Evidence safeguard: proposals, pilots, engineering-dependent systems, legal-review items, verified standards, and rejected claims remain visibly distinct.
Priority Questions
Housing delivery cost/time, resident outcomes, manufacturing workforce, water and energy performance, food-system safety, resilience, and replicability.
Concept Review
Zeolite/salt cooling, atmospheric water, thermal towers, aquaponics, and other advanced systems remain engineering-dependent until site-specific analysis supports them.
Rejected Claims
Perpetual-motion, “free energy,” unsupported health cures, and unsafe electroculture claims are not implementation standards.
Help shape B.L.U.E. responsibly
Questions, corrections, evidence, lived experience, and implementation expertise are welcome. Do not send sensitive personal records.